The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discrepancies in tumor mutation burden reporting from sequential endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration samples within single lymph node stations - brief report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259882 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Fielding, Andrew J. Dalley, Mahendra Singh, Lakshmy Nandakumar, Vanessa Lakis, Haarika Chittoory, David Fairbairn, Ann-Marie Patch, Stephen H. Kazakoff, Kaltin Ferguson, Farzad Bashirzadeh, Michael Bint, Carl Pahoff, Jung Hwa Son, Kimberley Ryan, Alan Hodgson, Sowmya Sharma, John V. Pearson, Nicola Waddell, Sunil R. Lakhani, Gunter Hartel, Peter T. Simpson, Katia Nones |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,313,853
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,227
of 22,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,089
of 369,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#96
of 928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,924 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.