The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A germline JAK2 exon12 mutation and a late somatic CALR mutation in a patient with essential thrombocythemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhuanghui Hao, Juan Li, Feng Gao, Weixiao Ren, Xiaomei Lu, Jinyi Feng, Chen Zhang, Sicheng Bian, Juan Xie, Ming Luo, Jianmei Chang, Wanfang Yang, Ruixia Hou, Daniel Muteb Muyey, Jing Xu, Jiangxia Cui, Xiuhua Chen, Hongwei Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,429,668
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,854
of 23,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,645
of 387,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#175
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.