The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical resection for bismuth types III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience from China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1280513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jianjun Wang, Yang Xia, Yuan Cao, Xintao Zeng, Hua Luo, Xianfu Cai, Mingsong Shi, Huiwen Luo, Decai Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,306,361
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,868
of 22,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,233
of 375,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#161
of 757 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,924 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 757 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.