The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intraductal magnetic resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma - a practical possibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1306242 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard R. A. Syms, Christopher A. Wadsworth, Evdokia Kardoulaki, Attapol Titapun, Wuttisak Boonphongsathien, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Shuo Zhang, Simon D. Taylor-Robinson, Nittaya Chamadol, Watcharin Loilome |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,297,882
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,034
of 23,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,379
of 352,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#36
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.