↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Heterogeneity in breast cancer: clinical and therapeutic implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Heterogeneity in breast cancer: clinical and therapeutic implications
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1321654
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Carlino, Cinzia Solinas, Michele Orditura, Maria Dezia Bisceglia, Benedetta Pellegrino, Anna Diana

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,828,757
of 26,114,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,245
of 22,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,290
of 348,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#174
of 777 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,114,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,899 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 777 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.