The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival of patients with stage III/IV early−onset colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1332499 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wanbin Yin, Wenju Pei, Tao Yu, Qi Zhang, Shiyao Zhang, Maorun Zhang, Gang Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,039,856
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,794
of 23,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,729
of 351,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#49
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.