The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interstitial needles versus intracavitary applicators only for locally advanced cervical cancer: results from real-life dosimetric comparisons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1347727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abel Cordoba, Estelle Gesta, Alexandre Escande, Alexandra Noeuveglise, Romain Cayez, Adrien Halty, Mohamed Tahar Ladjimi, Fabrice Narducci, Delphine Hudry, Carlos Martinez Gomez, Sofia Cordoba, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Maël Barthoulot, Eric F. Lartigau |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,309,356
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,637
of 22,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,365
of 346,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#260
of 613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.