The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enfortumab vedotin–related cutaneous toxicity correlates with overall survival in patients with urothelial cancer: a retrospective experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1377842 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evangelia Vlachou, Burles Avner Johnson, David McConkey, Yuezhou Jing, Andres Matoso, Noah M. Hahn, Jean Hoffman-Censits |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,825,600
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,480
of 22,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,140
of 266,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#21
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.