↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

reddit
2 Redditors
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1384906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiang Chen, Shuo Ying, Jianwen Qin, Li Zhang

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,519,690
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,944
of 23,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,902
of 200,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#43
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.