↓ Skip to main content

Avelumab maintenance therapy for node-positive muscle invasive bladder cancer: a report of two cases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avelumab maintenance therapy for node-positive muscle invasive bladder cancer: a report of two cases
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren M. C. Poon, Lap Yin Ho, Yiu Ming Kwong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,853,992
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,251
of 22,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,116
of 213,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#43
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,909 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.