↓ Skip to main content

Case report: Spinal cord stimulation for pain relief in two patients with locally recurrent pelvic malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case report: Spinal cord stimulation for pain relief in two patients with locally recurrent pelvic malignancy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1403703
Authors

Yousif Salem, Charles T. West, Malcolm West, Hideaki Yano, Paul Fernandes, Girish Vajramani, Alexander Mirnezami

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,081,997
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,080
of 22,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,442
of 161,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#17
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,937 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.