↓ Skip to main content

Current chemotherapy strategies for adults with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current chemotherapy strategies for adults with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1438905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Bao, Rui Sun, Zhenjiang Pan, Shepeng Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2024.
All research outputs
#18,113,134
of 26,498,650 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,422
of 23,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,462
of 232,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#46
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,498,650 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.