The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of EMS, IFC, and TENS on patient-reported outcome measures for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pain Research, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpain.2024.1346694 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel Wolfe, Brent Rosenstein, Maryse Fortin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Chemistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,029,238
of 26,186,522 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pain Research
#134
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,121
of 148,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pain Research
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,186,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.