The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Prospective Assessment of the Effect of Aminophylline Therapy on Urine Output and Inflammation in Critically Ill Children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2014.00059 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert F. Tamburro, Neal J. Thomas, Gary D. Ceneviva, Michael D. Dettorre, Gretchen L. Brummel, Steven E. Lucking |
Abstract |
Aminophylline, an established bronchodilator, is also purported to be an effective diuretic and anti-inflammatory agent. However, the data to support these contentions are scant. We conducted a prospective, open-label, single arm, single center study to assess the hypothesis that aminophylline increases urine output and decreases inflammation in critically ill children. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 38% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,182,706
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,943
of 8,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,315
of 244,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.