↓ Skip to main content

The Human Neonatal Gut Microbiome: A Brief Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
43 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
654 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Human Neonatal Gut Microbiome: A Brief Review
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fped.2015.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily C. Gritz, Vineet Bhandari

Abstract

The field of genomics has expanded into subspecialties such as metagenomics over the course of the last decade and a half. The development of massively parallel sequencing capabilities has allowed for increasingly detailed study of the genome of the human microbiome, the microbial super organ that resides symbiotically within the mucosal tissues and integumentary system of the human host. The gut microbiome, and particularly the study of its origins in neonates, has become subtopics of great interest within the field of genomics. This brief review seeks to summarize recent literature regarding the origins and establishment of the neonatal gut microbiome, beginning in utero, and how it is affected by neonatal nutritional status (breastfed versus formula fed) and gestational age (term versus preterm). We also explore the role of dysbiosis, a perturbation within the fragile ecosystem of the microbiome, and its role in the origin of select pathologic states, specifically, obesity and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. We discuss the evidence supporting enteral pre- and pro-biotic supplementation of commensal organisms such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the neonatal period, and their role in the prevention and amelioration of NEC in premature infants. Finally, we review directions to consider for further research to promote human health within this field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 654 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 638 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 14%
Researcher 84 13%
Student > Bachelor 80 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 100 15%
Unknown 163 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 77 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 59 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 3%
Other 69 11%
Unknown 185 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#921,446
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#144
of 7,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,315
of 273,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.