↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Mucosal Immunity in the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Mucosal Immunity in the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fped.2017.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zerina Hodzic, Alexa M. Bolock, Misty Good

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most devastating gastrointestinal disease of prematurity. Although the precise cause is not well understood, the main risk factors thought to contribute to NEC include prematurity, formula feeding, and bacterial colonization. Recent evidence suggests that NEC develops as a consequence of intestinal hyper-responsiveness to microbial ligands upon bacterial colonization in the preterm infant, initiating a cascade of aberrant signaling events, and a robust pro-inflammatory mucosal immune response. We now have a greater understanding of important mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, such as the role of cytokines, immunoglobulins, and immune cells in NEC. In this review, we will provide an overview of the mucosal immunity of the intestine and the relationship between components of the mucosal immune system involved in the pathogenesis of NEC, while highlighting recent advances in the field that have promise as potential therapeutic targets. First, we will describe the cellular components of the intestinal epithelium and mucosal immune system and their relationship to NEC. We will then discuss the relationship between the gut microbiota and cell signaling that underpins disease pathogenesis. We will conclude our discussion by highlighting notable therapeutic advancements in NEC that target the intestinal mucosal immunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 51 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 56 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#17,881,664
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,931
of 6,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,781
of 310,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#48
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.