↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal Meningitis: Overcoming Challenges in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment with Omics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neonatal Meningitis: Overcoming Challenges in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment with Omics
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fped.2017.00139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott M. Gordon, Lakshmi Srinivasan, Mary Catherine Harris

Abstract

Neonatal meningitis is a devastating condition. Prognosis has not improved in decades, despite the advent of improved antimicrobial therapy and heightened index of suspicion among clinicians caring for affected infants. One in ten infants die from meningitis, and up to half of survivors develop significant lifelong complications, including seizures, impaired hearing and vision, and delayed or arrested development of such basic skills as talking and walking. At present, it is not possible to predict which infants will suffer poor outcomes. Early treatment is critical to promote more favorable outcomes, though diagnosis of meningitis in infants is technically challenging, time-intensive, and invasive. Profound neuronal injury has long been described in the setting of neonatal meningitis, as has elevated levels of many pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Mechanisms of the host immune response that drive clearance of the offending organism and underlie brain injury due to meningitis are not well understood, however. In this review, we will discuss challenges in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of neonatal meningitis. We will highlight transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data that contribute to suggested mechanisms of inflammation and brain injury in this setting with a view toward fruitful areas for future investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 43 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 51 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,443,431
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,336
of 6,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,786
of 292,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#29
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.