Title |
A Program for Weaning Children from Enteral Feeding in a General Pediatric Unit: How, for Whom, and with What Results?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2018.00010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Justine Mirete, Béatrice Thouvenin, Gaelle Malecot, Morgane Le-Gouëz, Christel Chalouhi, Catherine du Fraysseix, Aurélie Royer, Anais Leon, Clément Vachey, Véronique Abadie |
Abstract |
To describe a series of children who were hospitalized for a tube-weaning program in the general pediatric ward of a pediatric tertiary university hospital: describe our method, to determine the success rate of our inpatient pediatric tube weaning program, and search for relevant factors linked to its success or failure. We analyzed the medical files of consecutive children who were hospitalized for gastric-tube weaning over an 8-year period. We analyzed outcomes in terms of feeding and growth with at least 2 years of data. Success (weaning within 3 months) and failure were compared by characteristics of children. We included 37 children (29 females) with mean (SD) age 31.4 (21) months. Most had a severe medical history (30% prematurity; 50% intrauterine growth restriction, 50% neurological and genetic anomalies). The weaning program was successful for half of the children. Factors linked to success of the program were female sex (p = 0.0188), normal neurodevelopment (p = 0.0016), nasogastric tube (p = 0.0098), and with <24 months on EF before the stay (p = 0.0309). Comparing the efficiency of various methods and results among teams was difficult, which indicates the need to establish consensus about the outcome criteria. We confirm the need for these types of stays and programs. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 46% |