The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of Sensory Processing and Executive Functions in Childhood: Development, Reliability, and Validity of the EPYFEI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2018.00071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dulce Romero-Ayuso, Sara Jorquera-Cabrera, Antonio Segura-Fragoso, Abel Toledano-González, M. Carmen Rodríguez-Martínez, José Matías Triviño-Juárez |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the "Assessment of Sensory Processing and Executive Functions in Childhood" (EPYFEI), a questionnaire designed to assess the sensory processing and executive functions of children aged between 3 and 11 years. The EPYFEI was completed by a sample of 1,732 parents of children aged between 3 and 11 years who lived in Spain. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and showed five main factors: (1) executive attention, working memory, and initiation of actions; (2) general sensory processing; (3) emotional and behavioral self-regulation; (4) supervision, correction of actions, and problem solving; and (5) inhibitory. The reliability of the analysis was high both for the whole questionnaire and for the factors it is composed of. Results provide evidence of the potential usefulness of the EPYFEI in clinical contexts for the early detection of neurodevelopmental disorders, in which there may be a deficit of executive functions and sensory processing. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 14 | 42% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,190,626
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#180
of 7,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,944
of 349,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.