↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric Videosomnography: Can Signal/Video Processing Distinguish Sleep and Wake States?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pediatric Videosomnography: Can Signal/Video Processing Distinguish Sleep and Wake States?
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00158
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. J. Schwichtenberg, Jeehyun Choe, Ashleigh Kellerman, Emily A. Abel, Edward J. Delp

Abstract

The term videosomnography captures a range of video-based methods used to record and subsequently score sleep behaviors (most commonly sleep vs. wake states). Until recently, the time consuming nature of behavioral videosomnography coding has limited its clinical and research applications. However, with recent technological advancements, the use of auto-videosomnography techniques may be a practical and valuable extension of behavioral videosomnography coding. To test an auto-videosomnography system within a pediatric sample, we processed 30 videos of infant/toddler sleep using a series of signal/video-processing techniques. The resulting auto-videosomnography system provided minute-by-minute sleep vs. wake estimates, which were then compared to behaviorally coded videosomnography and actigraphy. Minute-by-minute estimates demonstrated moderate agreement across compared methods (auto-videosomnography with behavioral videosomnography, Cohen's kappa = 0.46; with actigraphy = 0.41). Additionally, auto-videosomnography agreements exhibited high sensitivity for sleep but only about half of the wake minutes were correctly identified. For sleep timing (sleep onset and morning rise time), behavioral videosomnography and auto-videosomnography demonstrated strong agreement. However, nighttime waking agreements were poor across both behavioral videosomnography and actigraphy comparisons. Overall, this study provides preliminary support for the use of an auto-videosomnography system to index sleep onset and morning rise time only, which may have potential telemedicine implications. With replication, auto-videosomnography may be useful for researchers and clinicians as a minimally invasive sleep timing assessment method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 24%
Engineering 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,218,455
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#546
of 6,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,623
of 328,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#17
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.