↓ Skip to main content

Narrowing the Genetic Causes of Language Dysfunction in the 1q21.1 Microduplication Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Narrowing the Genetic Causes of Language Dysfunction in the 1q21.1 Microduplication Syndrome
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Benítez-Burraco, Montserrat Barcos-Martínez, Isabel Espejo-Portero, Maite Fernández-Urquiza, Raúl Torres-Ruiz, Sandra Rodríguez-Perales, Ma Salud Jiménez-Romero

Abstract

The chromosome 1q21.1 duplication syndrome (OMIM# 612475) is characterized by head anomalies, mild facial dysmorphisms, and cognitive problems, including autistic features, mental retardation, developmental delay, and learning disabilities. Speech and language development are sometimes impaired, but no detailed characterization of language problems in this condition has been provided to date. We report in detail on the cognitive and language phenotype of a child who presents with a duplication in 1q21.1 (arr[hg19] 1q21.1q21.2(145,764,455-147,824,207) × 3), and who exhibits cognitive delay and behavioral disturbances. Language is significantly perturbed, being the expressive domain the most impaired area (with significant dysphemic features in absence of pure motor speech deficits), although language comprehension and use (pragmatics) are also affected. Among the genes found duplicated in the child, CDH1L is upregulated in the blood of the proband. ROBO1, a candidate for dyslexia, is also highly upregulated, whereas, TLE3, a target of FOXP2, is significantly downregulated. These changes might explain language, and particularly speech dysfunction in the proband.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Linguistics 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,572,565
of 26,102,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,182
of 7,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,728
of 345,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#55
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,102,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.