You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2019.00312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Di Nardo, Anna Dalle Ore, Giuseppina Testa, Gail Annich, Edoardo Piervincenzi, Giorgio Zampini, Gabriella Bottari, Corrado Cecchetti, Antonio Amodeo, Roberto Lorusso, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Roxanne Kirsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Qatar | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Chile | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 20% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,506,752
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#393
of 6,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,448
of 346,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#15
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.