The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Evidence for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Congenital Neutrophil Disorders: A Comprehensive Review by the Inborn Errors Working Party Group of the EBMT
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2019.00436 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shahrzad Bakhtiar, Bella Shadur, Polina Stepensky |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 24% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,585,448
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,713
of 6,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,905
of 360,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#70
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.