↓ Skip to main content

Cardiopulmonary Bypass and AKI: AKI Is Bad, So Let's Get Beyond the Diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiopulmonary Bypass and AKI: AKI Is Bad, So Let's Get Beyond the Diagnosis
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fped.2019.00492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine D. Krawczeski

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,061,719
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,341
of 6,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,137
of 459,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#53
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.