The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Laparoscopic vs. Open Pyloromyotomy in Treatment of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2020.00426 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ibrahim Ismail, Radi Elsherbini, Adham Elsaied, Kamal Aly, Hesham Sheir |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 17 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,371,766
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,314
of 6,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,425
of 398,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#56
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.