↓ Skip to main content

Non-casual Association Between Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformations/Primary Lung Hypoplasia and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-casual Association Between Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformations/Primary Lung Hypoplasia and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH)
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fped.2020.00446
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gloria Pelizzo, Sara Costanzo, Giorgio Giuseppe O. Selvaggio, Federico Rebosio, Lorena Canazza, Federica Marinoni, Valeria Calcaterra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#20,632,826
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,290
of 6,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,198
of 398,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#159
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.