↓ Skip to main content

Profiling FLT3 Mutations in Mexican Acute Myeloid Leukemia Pediatric Patients: Impact on Overall Survival

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Profiling FLT3 Mutations in Mexican Acute Myeloid Leukemia Pediatric Patients: Impact on Overall Survival
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fped.2020.00586
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Molina Garay, Karol Carrillo Sánchez, Luis Leonardo Flores Lagunes, Marco Jiménez Olivares, Anallely Muñoz Rivas, Beatríz Eugenia Villegas Torres, Hilario Flores Aguilar, Juan Carlos Núñez Enríquez, Elva Jiménez Hernández, Vilma Carolina Bekker Méndez, José Refugio Torres Nava, Janet Flores Lujano, Jorge Alfonso Martín Trejo, Minerva Mata Rocha, Aurora Medina Sansón, Laura Eugenia Espinoza Hernández, José Gabriel Peñaloza Gonzalez, Rosa Martha Espinosa Elizondo, Luz Victoria Flores Villegas, Raquel Amador Sanchez, Maria Luisa Pérez Saldívar, Omar Alejandro Sepúlveda Robles, Haydeé Rosas Vargas, Angélica Rangel López, María Lilia Domínguez López, Ethel Awilda García Latorre, Elba Reyes Maldonado, Patricia Galindo Delgado, Juan Manuel Mejía Aranguré, Carmen Alaez Verson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,745,728
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,482
of 6,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,168
of 376,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#148
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.