↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Framework for Phenotyping Children With Suspected or Confirmed Infection for Future Biomarker Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Framework for Phenotyping Children With Suspected or Confirmed Infection for Future Biomarker Studies
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fped.2021.688272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruud G. Nijman, Rianne Oostenbrink, Henriette A. Moll, Climent Casals-Pascual, Ulrich von Both, Aubrey Cunnington, Tisham De, Irini Eleftheriou, Marieke Emonts, Colin Fink, Michiel van der Flier, Ronald de Groot, Myrsini Kaforou, Benno Kohlmaier, Taco W. Kuijpers, Emma Lim, Ian K. Maconochie, Stephane Paulus, Federico Martinon-Torres, Marko Pokorn, Sam T. Romaine, Irene Rivero Calle, Luregn J. Schlapbach, Frank J. Smit, Maria Tsolia, Effua Usuf, Victoria J. Wright, Shunmay Yeung, Dace Zavadska, Werner Zenz, Michael Levin, Jethro A. Herberg, Enitan D. Carrol, The PERFORM consortium

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Other 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 25 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 29 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#989,187
of 26,737,936 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#167
of 8,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,493
of 447,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#6
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,737,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.