↓ Skip to main content

Neuroprem 2: An Italian Study of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroprem 2: An Italian Study of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fped.2021.697100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Licia Lugli, Luca Bedetti, Isotta Guidotti, Marisa Pugliese, Odoardo Picciolini, Maria Federica Roversi, Elisa DellaCasa Muttini, Laura Lucaccioni, Natascia Bertoncelli, Gina Ancora, Giancarlo Gargano, Fabio Mosca, Fabrizio Sandri, Luigi Tommaso Corvaglia, Agostina Solinas, Serafina Perrone, Marcello Stella, The Neuroprem Working Group, Lorenzo Iughetti, Alberto Berardi, Fabrizio Ferrari, Antonella Luglio, Sara Grandi, Valentina Fiorini, Piero Catenazzi, Elisa Ballardini, Sabrina Moretti, Daniela Turoli, Arianna Aceti, Roberto Bellù, Luca Ori, Silvia Braibanti, Alessandra Boncompagni, Caterina Spada, Lara Valeri

Abstract

Background: Despite the increased survival of preterm newborns worldwide, the risk of neurodevelopmental disabilities remains high. Analyzing the outcomes of the preterm population can identify risk factors and enable specific early interventions. Aims: Neuroprem is a prospective cohort study of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants that aims to evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes and risk factors for severe functional disability at 2 years of corrected age. Methods: Nine Italian neonatal intensive care units participated in the network. The Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales (GMDS-R) or the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSDI III) and a neuro-functional evaluation (according to the International Classification of Disability and Health and Neuro-Functional Assessment, or NFA ICF-CY) were administered to VLBW infants at 24 months of corrected age. The primary outcome measure was severe functional disability, defined as cerebral palsy, bilateral blindness, deafness, an NFA ICF-CY of >2, a BSDI III cognitive composite score of <2 SD, or a GMDS-R global quotient score of <2 SD. Perinatal risk factors for severe functional disability were assessed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Among 502 VLBW survivors who completed the 24-month follow-up, 48 (9.6%) presented severe functional disability, of whom 27 had cerebral palsy (5.4%). Rates of severe functional disability and cerebral palsy were higher in neonates with a lower gestational age (p < 0.001). Overall, 147 infants (29.3%) were referred to neuromotor intervention. In the multivariate regression model, gestational age at birth OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.90; p = 0.001) and periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.19-5.26; p = 0.015) were significantly associated with severe functional disability. Conclusion: Neuroprem 2 provides updated information on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of VLBW infants in a large Italian cohort. The overall rate of neurodevelopmental disabilities was quite lower than reported in the previous literature. These data indicate the need for structured follow-up programs from a national neonatal network perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 21 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,506,355
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,749
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,510
of 427,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#93
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.