The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The LiberAction Project: Implementation of a Pediatric Liberation Bundle to Screen Delirium, Reduce Benzodiazepine Sedation, and Provide Early Mobilization in a Human Resource-Limited Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2021.788997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Di Nardo, Francesca Boldrini, Francesca Broccati, Federica Cancani, Tiziana Satta, Francesca Stoppa, Leonardo Genuini, Giorgio Zampini, Salvatore Perdichizzi, Gabriella Bottari, Maximilian Fischer, Orsola Gawronski, Annamaria Bonetti, Irene Piermarini, Veronica Recchiuti, Paola Leone, Angela Rossi, Paola Tabarini, Daniele Biasucci, Alberto Villani, Massimiliano Raponi, Corrado Cecchetti, Karen Choong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,553,699
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#249
of 8,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,365
of 530,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#13
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.