The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2021.793308 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
E. J. Verweij, Lien De Proost, Judith O. E. H. van Laar, Lily Frank, Sylvia A. Obermann-Borstn, Marijn J. Vermeulen, Sophie van Baalen, M. Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt, Elselijn Kingma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 3 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,289,481
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#201
of 8,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,072
of 531,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#10
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.