The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program to Improve Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Four Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Pune, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2021.794637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Johnson, Asad Latif, Bharat Randive, Abhay Kadam, Uday Rajput, Aarti Kinikar, Nandini Malshe, Sanjay Lalwani, Tushar B. Parikh, Umesh Vaidya, Sudhir Malwade, Sharad Agarkhedkar, Melanie S. Curless, Susan E. Coffin, Rachel M. Smith, Matthew Westercamp, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Matthew L. Robinson, Vidya Mave, Amita Gupta, Yukari C. Manabe, Aaron M. Milstone |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,052,902
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#920
of 8,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,684
of 532,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#52
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.