The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric venous thromboembolism: Review of approved products rivaroxaban and dabigatran
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2022.1005098 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maha Al-Ghafry, Anjali Sharathkumar |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Researcher | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 37% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,182,502
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,592
of 7,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,858
of 430,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#62
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.