↓ Skip to main content

Isolated Crohn's Colitis: Is Localization Crucial? Characteristics of Pediatric Patients From the CEDATA–GPGE Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isolated Crohn's Colitis: Is Localization Crucial? Characteristics of Pediatric Patients From the CEDATA–GPGE Registry
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.875938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lotta Elonen, Lena Wölfle, Jan de Laffolie, Carsten Posovszky, the CEDATA–GPGE-Study-Group, Tobias Schwerdt, Rainer Ganschow, Stefan Trenkel, Burkhard Rodeck, Stefan Wirth, Marlen Zurek, Matthias Heiduk, Michael Paulussen, Gunter Flemming, Ekkehard Sturm, Axel Enninger, Söhnke Dammann, Henning Böhme, Michael Melter, Thomas Lang, Philip Bufler, Thomas Lücke, Markus Knuf, Norbert Wagner, Thomas Kaiser, Ralf Pallacks, Andre Hörning, Jens Klinge, Steffen Reinsch, Rüdiger Adam, Stefan Buderus, Markus Richter, Antje Ballauf, Ilse Broekaert, Lars Heerdts, Carolin Blüml, Sabine Peitzsch, Andreas Krahl, Simone Jedwilayties, Maik Heine, Marko Reitmann, Kai Nils Pargac, Thomas Lang, Jutta Kringel, Anke Dick, Patrick Gerner, Michael Friedt, Enno Iven, Gunter Burmester, Anke Esser, Olaf Raecke, Kerstin Ehrentraut, Esther Schmidt, Jan Däbritz, Stefan Sgoll, Ahlke Willenborg, Sebastian Horn, Ralph Melchior, Rüdiger Kardoff, Martina Kohl-Sobania, Benedikt Pircher, Christoph Ehrsam, Daniela Nolkemper, Adrian Lieb, Almuth Hauer, Markus Prenninger, Martin Laaß, Dieter Furthner

Abstract

Pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are classified into Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and unclassifiable (IBD-U). However, data provide evidence that ileal CD (L1) is distinct from colonic CD (L2). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features of isolated Crohn's colitis in a pediatric population. Children who were prospectively included in the CEDATA-GPGE registry on diagnosis were compared according to the diagnosis of CD with L2 vs. L1 and ileocolonic (L3) involvement pattern as well as IBD-U and UC. The clinical significance of L2 was investigated with regard to extraintestinal manifestations, treatment, surgery, and disease activity. Fifty-two patients with L2 CD at a median age of 13.4 years (±3.8 SD) were compared with 182 L1 (13.8 ± 2.9 SD), 782 with L3 (12.8 ± 3.3 SD), 653 with UC (12.7 ± 3.8 SD), and 111 patients with IBD-U (11.9 ± 4.7 SD). Bloody stools at diagnosis were more common in L2 (44%) than in L1 (19.7%) and L3 (28.8%), but not as common as in UC (66.5%) and IBD-U (61.3%). Fewer CD patients with L2 (10.2%) received exclusive enteral nutrition therapy (EEN) as induction than patients with L1 (34.3%) and L3 (33.3%). After induction therapy, 42.3% of patients with L2 received immunosuppressants and 21% biologicals during follow-up (L1 56.5/10.5%; L3 59/21%; CU 43.5/11.9%; IBD-U 26.1/12.6%). Extraintestinal manifestations were more frequent in L2 (23.1%) vs. L1 (18.7%), L3 (20.2%), CU (15.8%), and IBD-U (11.7%). The number of patients requiring surgery did not differ within the CD subgroups and was significantly lower in UC and IBD-U. Perianal fistula surgery was significantly more common in L2 (44%) than in L1 (4.8%) or L3 (21.7%). In addition, the frequency of surgery for perianal abscesses was also more frequent in L2 (55.6%) than in L1 (12.7%) or L3 (38.4%). The consideration of pediatric Crohn's colitis as a distinct disease seems necessary as it is characterized by extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) with mainly joint involvement and perianal fistulas or abscesses requiring surgery and biologic therapy. Thus, colonic Crohn's disease may have an influence on the therapeutic stratification and should be addressed in further studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#19,539,805
of 24,037,100 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,782
of 6,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,757
of 430,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#290
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,100 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.