The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a Nationally Agreed Core Clinical Dataset for Childhood Onset Uveitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2022.881398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ameenat Lola Solebo, Salomey Kellett, Jugnoo Rahi, Reshma Pattani, Clive Edelsten, Andrew D. Dick, Alastair Denniston, The Pediatric Ocular Inflammation UNICORN Study Group, Ameenat Lola Solebo, Salomey Kellett, Andrew D Dick, Jugnoo Rahi, Alastair Denniston, Damien C.M. Yeo, Jose Gonzalez-Martin, Eibhlin McLoone, Rachel Pilling, John Bradbury, Athimalaipet V Ramanan, Catherine Guly, Brinda Muthusamy, Patrick Watts, Christine Twomey, Reshma Pattani, Clive Edelsten, Daniel Pharoah, Vernon Long, Adam Bates, Elisabetta Scoppettuolo, Jane Ashworth, Laura Steeples, Harry Petrushkin, Dhanes Thomas, Alan John Connor, Una O'Colmain, Anas Injarie, Narman Puvanachandra, Archana Pradeep, Srilakshmi Sharma, Conrad Schmoll, Eoghan Millar, Kate Bush, M. Ashwin Reddy, Jessy Choi, Gisella Cooper, Kristina May, Ed Hughes, Ailsa Ritchie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,883,321
of 24,935,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,129
of 7,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,441
of 434,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#136
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,935,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.