The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modulating Role of Breastfeeding Toward Long COVID Occurrence in Children: A Preliminary Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2022.884962 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia Vizzari, Daniela Morniroli, Valentina Tiraferri, Silvana Castaldi, Maria Francesca Patria, Paola Marchisio, Carlo Agostoni, Fabio Mosca, Danilo Buonsenso, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Maria Lorella Giannì, The CHICO Study Group, Francesco Folino, Maria Carola Pensabene, Marina Macchi, Cristina De Rose, Rosa Morello, Carolina Gentili, Margherita Zona, Alessia De Matteis |
| Abstract |
The SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2) pandemic has forced the global health system to face new challenges both in the acute management of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) patients and in its consequences. In particular, the long-term effects of this new virus, especially in children, are still poorly understood. Scientific research is currently trying to understand the mechanisms underlying the so called "long COVID syndrome". Since the beginning of the pandemic, breastmilk has been studied for its antiviral and immunomodulatory properties. Based on these assumptions, we conducted a preliminary study in order to investigate the prevalence of long COVID in a cohort of Italian children with previously detected SARS-CoV-2 infection and evaluate if breastfeeding might play a role in modulating long COVID occurrence. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,504,383
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#625
of 7,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,330
of 435,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#50
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.