↓ Skip to main content

Mutational Landscape of CEBPA in Mexican Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Prognostic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutational Landscape of CEBPA in Mexican Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Prognostic Implications
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.899742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Molina Garay, Karol Carrillo Sánchez, Luis Leonardo Flores Lagunes, Marco Jiménez Olivares, Anallely Muñoz Rivas, Beatríz Eugenia Villegas Torres, Hilario Flores Aguilar, Juan Carlos Núñez Enríquez, Elva Jiménez Hernández, Vilma Carolina Bekker Méndez, José Refugio Torres Nava, Janet Flores Lujano, Jorge Alfonso Martín Trejo, Minerva Mata Rocha, Aurora Medina Sansón, Laura Eugenia Espinoza Hernández, José Gabriel Peñaloza Gonzalez, Rosa Martha Espinosa Elizondo, Luz Victoria Flores Villegas, Raquel Amador Sanchez, María Luisa Pérez Saldívar, Omar Alejandro Sepúlveda Robles, Haydeé Rosas Vargas, Silvia Jiménez Morales, Patricia Galindo Delgado, Juan Manuel Mejía Aranguré, Carmen Alaez Verson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,438,713
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,011
of 6,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,717
of 423,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#217
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.