↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Common Beta-Thalassemia (β-Thalassemia) Mutations in East Java, Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Common Beta-Thalassemia (β-Thalassemia) Mutations in East Java, Indonesia
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.925599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yetti Hernaningsih, Yuli Syafitri, Yulia Nadar Indrasari, Prafa Alif Rahmawan, Mia Ratwita Andarsini, Indra Lesmana, Emmanuel Jairaj Moses, Nur Arzuar Abdul Rahim, Narazah Mohd Yusoff

Abstract

The frequency of the beta-thalassemia (β-thalassemia) gene in Indonesia ranges from 3 to 10%. However, in the East Java province, there is still limited information on the prevalence of β-thalassemia mutations in clinically diagnosed beta-thalassemia patients of East Java. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize β-thalassemia mutations in selected patients in the East Java province of Indonesia. This is an analytical observational study. Diagnosis of β-thalassemia was based on clinical presentation, complete blood count (CBC), and hemoglobin (Hb) electrophoresis. Blood specimens taken from each patient in three ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes were analyzed for CBC and Hb electrophoresis and processed for DNA extraction and subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Detection of mutations in Hemoglobin Subunit Beta (HBB) gene exons 1-3 of the β-thalassemia gene as the common mutation in Indonesia was done using PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. In total, 33 (n = 33) participants were involved in this study with ages ranging from 5 to 17 years comprising 19 women and 14 men. Their ethnic origins were Javanese (n = 30) and Chinese (n = 3). CBC results showed that mean ± standard deviation (SD) for Hb, red blood cell (RBC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and red cell distribution width (RDW)-CV were 81.2 ± 7.0 g/L; 3.40 ± 0.39 × 109/L; 71.05 ± 5.72 fL; 24.12 ± 2.45 pg; 33.91 ± 1.47 g/dl; 24.38 ± 6.02%, respectively. Hb electrophoresis revealed that 5 out of 33 participants had beta-thalassemia and 28 out of 33 participants had hemoglobinopathy (Hb) E/beta-thalassemia. Results of Sanger sequencing showed the following genotype variations in the samples: 12 (36.4%) with β CD26 /β IVS-I-5; 6 (18.2%) with β CD26 /β CD35; 3 (9.1%) with β CD26 /β IVS-I-2; 2 (6.1%) with β CD27/28 /β CD40; 2 (6.1%) with β IVS-I-1 /β CAP+1; and β CD26 /β IVS-I-1; β IVS-I-5 /β CAP+1; β IVS-I-5 /β CD35; β CD26 /β CD37; β CD26 /β CD15; β CD26 /β CD40; and β IVS-I-5 /β CD19 in 1 (3%) sample, respectively, and 1 (3%) had no abnormality detected in sequencing even though electrophoresis showed abnormality in the migration pattern. The β CD26 /β IVS-I-5 mutation was found in samples that were noted to have Hb E/beta-thalassemia on Hb electrophoresis. The underlying genetic variations are heterogeneous in thalassemia patients in East Java, where 12 variants were found. The most common variant was β CD26 /β IVS-I-5, which all accounted for Hb E/beta-thalassemia on Hb electrophoresis. Furthermore, 28 out of 33 participants had hemoglobinopathy (Hb) E/beta-thalassemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 10%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 23 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Unspecified 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,516,936
of 24,302,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,031
of 7,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,102
of 423,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#215
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,302,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.