The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Kidney replacement therapy advances in children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2022.970884 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rupesh Raina, Sidharth Kumar Sethi, Nikhil Nair, H. K. Yap |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 15% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 8% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,540,007
of 24,330,613 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#817
of 7,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,129
of 423,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#44
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,330,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.