↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of three clinical scoring tools for bronchiolitis to predict the need for respiratory support and length of stay in neonates and infants up to three months of age

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of three clinical scoring tools for bronchiolitis to predict the need for respiratory support and length of stay in neonates and infants up to three months of age
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fped.2023.1040354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenico Umberto De Rose, Chiara Maddaloni, Ludovica Martini, Annabella Braguglia, Andrea Dotta, Cinzia Auriti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 11 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 11 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,187,476
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,147
of 7,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,636
of 428,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#106
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.