The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Multiple epstein-barr virus-associated smooth muscle tumours in a child with IL-2-inducible T-cell kinase mutation of undetermined clinical significance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2023.1189219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiongli Wen, Jing Ning, Zhiqun Mao, Xiangdang Long, Xiangling He, Zhihong Chen, Qiuyi Di, Qiaorong Li, Yu Zhuo, Gang Zhong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,289,790
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,004
of 8,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,577
of 379,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#62
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.