The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Venom immunotherapy protocols in the pediatric population: how to choose?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2023.1192081 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesca Saretta, Mattia Giovannini, Benedetta Pessina, Simona Barni, Giulia Liccioli, Lucrezia Sarti, Leonardo Tomei, Camilla Fazi, Francesco Pegoraro, Claudia Valleriani, Silvia Ricci, Chiara Azzari, Elio Novembre, Francesca Mori |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,166,745
of 24,588,574 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,649
of 7,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,858
of 275,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#42
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,588,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.