↓ Skip to main content

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated cycle syndrome: a case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated cycle syndrome: a case report and literature review
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fped.2023.1296487
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ziwei Li, Xiaoping Jing, Shuya Zhang, Tiantian Liu, Qingyin Guo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#21,351,685
of 26,208,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,329
of 8,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,662
of 379,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#126
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,208,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.