The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Percutaneous calcium sulfate injection versus localized scrape bone grafting: clinical effect comparison in titanium elastic nail treatment of pathological fracture of proximal humerus caused by unicameral bone cysts in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2023.1334950 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuyin Xie, Zhenqi Song, Zhongwen Tang, Zheng Xu, Zhouzhou Rao, Jie Wen, Sheng Xiao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,450,032
of 26,322,284 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,359
of 8,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,064
of 379,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#137
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,322,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.