The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The neonatal adverse event severity scale: current status, a stakeholders' assessment, and future perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2023.1340607 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karel Allegaert, Thomas Salaets, Kelly Wade, Mary A. Short, Robert Ward, Kanwaljit Singh, Mark A. Turner, Jonathan M. Davis, Tamorah Lewis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,471,216
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,662
of 7,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,635
of 327,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#26
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.