↓ Skip to main content

A clinical evaluation and acceptability study of the innovative SurePulse VS wireless heart rate monitor across the neonatal journey

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A clinical evaluation and acceptability study of the innovative SurePulse VS wireless heart rate monitor across the neonatal journey
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fped.2024.1355777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Peterson, Clare Jennings, Ajit Mahaveer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,572,233
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,612
of 8,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,195
of 258,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#13
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.