↓ Skip to main content

Iron deficiency in the elderly population, revisited in the hepcidin era

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iron deficiency in the elderly population, revisited in the hepcidin era
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiana Busti, Natascia Campostrini, Nicola Martinelli, Domenico Girelli

Abstract

Iron deficiency (ID) is relatively common among the elderly population, contributing substantially to the high prevalence of anemia observed in the last decades of life, which in turn has important implications both on quality of life and on survival. In elderly subjects, ID is often multifactorial, i.e., due to multiple concurring causes, including inadequate dietary intake or absorption, occult bleeding, medications. Moreover, because of the typical multimorbidity of aged people, other conditions leading to anemia frequently coexist and make diagnosis of ID particularly challenging. Treatment of ID is also problematic in elderly, since response to oral iron is often slow, with a substantial fraction of patients showing refractoriness and requiring cumbersome intravenous administration. In the last decade, the discovery of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin has revolutionized our understanding of iron pathophysiology. In this review, we revisit ID among elderly people in the light of the impressive recent advances on knowledge of iron regulation, and discuss how hepcidin may help in diagnosis and treatment of this common clinical condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 63 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 72 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#208,993
of 26,170,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#93
of 20,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,610
of 242,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.