↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative use of remifentanil and opioid induced hyperalgesia/acute opioid tolerance: systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative use of remifentanil and opioid induced hyperalgesia/acute opioid tolerance: systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang Hun Kim, Nicoleta Stoicea, Suren Soghomonyan, Sergio D. Bergese

Abstract

The use of opioids has been increasing in operating room and intensive care unit to provide perioperative analgesia as well as stable hemodynamics. However, many authors have suggested that the use of opioids is associated with the expression of acute opioid tolerance (AOT) and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) in experimental studies and clinical observations in dose and/or time dependent exposure even when used within the clinically accepted doses. Recently, remifentanil has been used for pain management during anesthesia as well as in the intensive care units because of its rapid onset and offset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 13%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,192,854
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,047
of 18,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,065
of 232,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#33
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.