↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Core competencies for pharmaceutical physicians and drug development scientists

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Core competencies for pharmaceutical physicians and drug development scientists
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Honorio Silva, Peter Stonier, Fritz Buhler, Jean P. Deslypere, Domenico Criscuolo, Gerfried Nell, Joao Massud, Stewart Geary, Johanna Schenk, Sandor Kerpel-Fronius, Greg Koski, Norbert Clemens, Ingrid Klingmann, Gustavo Kesselring, Rudolf van Olden, Dominique Dubois

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 105 in vol. 4, PMID: 23986704.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#9,978
of 19,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,397
of 377,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.