↓ Skip to main content

Role of transporters in the distribution of platinum-based drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of transporters in the distribution of platinum-based drugs
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saliha Harrach, Giuliano Ciarimboli

Abstract

Platinum derivatives used as chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin and oxaliplatin have a potent antitumor activity. However, severe side effects such as nephro-, oto-, and neurotoxicity are associated with their use. Effects and side effects of platinum-based drugs are in part caused by their transporter-mediated uptake in target and non target cells. In this mini review, the transport systems involved in cellular handling of platinum derivatives are illustrated, focusing on transporters for cisplatin. The copper transporter 1 seems to be of particular importance for cisplatin uptake in tumor cells, while the organic cation transporter (OCT) 2, due to its specific organ distribution, may play a major role in the development of undesired cisplatin side effects. In polarized cells, e.g., in renal proximal tubule cells, apically expressed transporters, such as multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1, mediate secretion of cisplatin and in this way contribute to the control of its toxic effects. Specific inhibition of cisplatin uptake transporters such as the OCTs may be an attractive therapeutic option to reduce its toxicity, without impairing its antitumor efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Croatia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 20%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 21%
Chemistry 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 11%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,790,312
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,739
of 16,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,309
of 265,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#17
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.